.....

Rakesh Pathak

Law Firm

Specialize in Law and Litigation

Whatsapp & Phones +91 981 011 2993 (in India) and
+1 908 205 4766 (in USA)

E-mail PathakR7@Gmail.com

About Law Firm and Lawyers


Mr. Rakesh Pathak is practising law for last about 30 years. He worked for Allahabad Bank, Canara Bank and Punjab National Bank. He also worked for The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., United India Insurance Company Ltd., The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Jaypee Group, KIIT Univercity,Goyal Group,Thapar Group, Bhubaneswar Stock Exchange, Bandhua Mukti Morcha (Bonded Labour Libration Front), Inboit Solutions, Logitech Automation, Vedanta Resources, Crown Agents, Caladero SL, Navori International SA, STADA, Idea Management, Lahmeyer International, Bamco, NTN Bearing Corp., Dacasso; Google Inc. Pilkington, Epoka Group ; many other Corporate and individual clients. He has many publications in reputed law journals. He was on Editorial Board of five journals. He is regularly contributing for amendments in drafts of Bills / Acts of Parliament and Rules of Local Bodies. He is Director of Indian Council For Social Welfare, Bharatiya Sanskriti Parishad and other corporate bodies. He is President of Resident's Welfare Association of Central Delhi. He is a keen aviator and a qualified pilot.

Qualifications:

B.Sc.
LL.B.
M.B.A. (Human Resource Management)
Diploma in International Laws
Diploma in Laws of International Institutions
Diploma in Forensic Science
Private Pilot License Exam. of Director General of Civil Aviation, India.

Rakesh Pathak

Mr. Ajeet Kumar is an associate Lawyer with Rakesh Pathak Law Firm. He is a well qualified lawyer and completed his Law from Law Faculty University Of Delhi and enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council Of Delhi in the year 2018. He passed All India Bar Exam. He is Ex. Member of Entrepreneur Clinic of law faculty DU. He Also hold a B.Sc. (H) Physics Degree from Ramjas College University Of Delhi. He interned with Adv. K.C Verma Standing Counsel Gov. of India . He worked with Adv R.K Rawat Standing Counsel Haj Committee Gov. of NCT Delhi as Junior Advocate at Delhi High Court. He practices Law in District Courts and Delhi High Court and is litigating in the matters of Transfer of Property, IP Laws, Dealt in Injunction Suits, Suits For Specific Performance, Recovery Of Money, Possession, Summary Suits, Matrimonial Disputes, Criminal law, Dowry Harassment Laws, Arbitration, Consumer Protection Laws, Labor Disputes, Succession Disputes, , Disputes under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Disputes before the National Company Law Tribunal, Delhi State Consumer Commission, National Consumer Commission , Debt Recovery Tribunals, Real Estate (RERA) matters.

Ajeet Kumar

SERVICES

Legal services offered


Family Disputes

Marriage, Foreign Marriage, Seperation, Divorce, Mutual Consent Divorce, Alimony, Maintenance, Child Custody, Domestic Violence, Succession, WILL, Inheritance, Marriage Conselling, Domestic and International Adoptions.

Civil Disputes

All kind of civil disputes, Commercial disputes, Domestic and International Arbitration, Landlord and Tenacy disputes, Real Estate Property Transfer, Accident Claims, Insurance Claims, Compensation, Damages, Specific Preventive Reliefs, Trade Marks, Information Technology.

Criminal Disputes

Penal Laws, Economic Offences, Money Laudering, 498A, 406 IPC, Passport Act, Company Laws, Cheque dishonour cases, violations under Foreign Exchange Mangement Act, Cyber crimes.

Immigration & Citizenship

Visa, Visa for Permanent Residents, Passports, Citizenship, Overseas Citizen of India; Couselling, Documents fillings, Appeals.

Consumer Disputes

Unfair treatment or cost by seller or service providers; breach of obligations. Medical negligence; cases against builders and developers; insurance companies, Banks.

Employment Laws

Disputes under employment laws and compliance of labour laws, Human Resource Management practices, Domestic Enquiry.

LEGAL BLOGS

For more blogs, please visit our Google Blogger rpathak7.blogspot.com

On 19th Sept. 2018 , President of India promulgated an Ordinance -The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance 2018- Prohibited triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat); make such talaq void and illegal; punishable by imprisonment for a term which may extent to three years or / fine; Muslim woman entitled for subsistance allowance, custody of minor children; Offence compoundable at instance of married woman with permisson of Magistrate; No bail to accused without hearing Muslim woman. Complaint can be filed with Police Station.

On 6th Sept. 2018 Supreme Court of India, regarding LGBT, in case Navtej Singh Vs. Union of India Writ Petition Criminal 76 of 2016 declared that insofar as Section 377 Indian Penal Code, criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults (i.e. persons above the age of 18 years who are competent to consent) in private, is violative of Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. reading down Section 377 is necessary to exclude consensual sexual relationships between adults, whether of the same sex or otherwise, in private, so as to remove the vagueness of the provision to the extent it is inconsistent with Part III of the Constitution. History owes an apology to the members of this community and their families, for the delay in providing redressal for the ignominy and ostracism that they have suffered through the centuries. The members of this community were compelled to live a life full of fear of reprisal and persecution. This was on account of the ignorance of the majority to recognise that homosexuality is a completely natural condition, part of a range of human sexuality. The mis-application of this provision denied them the Fundamental Right to equality guaranteed by Article 14. It infringed the Fundamental Right to non-discrimination under Article 15, and the Fundamental Right to live a life of dignity and privacy guaranteed by Article. The LGBT persons deserve to live a life unshackled from the shadow of being ‘unapprehended felons’.

On 12th Sept. 2017 Supreme Court of India in its judgement Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Singh Civil Appeal 11158 of 2017 , held that waiting period of six months in Section 13 (B)(2) (Divorce by Mutual Consent) of Hindu Marriage Act 1955 was not mandaotry and can be waived under certain circumtanses.

On 24th Aug. 2017 nine Judges Bench of Supreme Court of India in case Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retd.) and others Vs. Union of India, Civil Writ 494 of 2014 held that right of privacy is protected as an interinsic part of the life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as part of freedoms guranteed under Part III of Constitution of India subject to restrictions specified, relatable to that part.

Career

Law Firm employ young lawyers and experienced lawyers, paralegals in India and USA for in various field of law, litigation and research. Please email us your resume on PathakR7@Gmail.com. Please do not call as no enquiry would be entertained and selected aplicant would be informed by email only.

CONTACT

Contact us by email on PathakR7@Gmail.com and we'll get back to you within 6 hours, if required.

Rakesh Pathak
Advocate
7 Jantar Mantar Road,
New Delhi-110001 INDIA
Phone, Whatsapp +91 981 011 2993

AND
409 Hamilton Blvd.,
South Plainfield, New Jersey 07080,
United States of America

Phone +1 908 205 4766


Directions / Maps

Rakesh Pathak
Law Firm

Email PathakR7@GMAIL.COM
Phones and Whatsapp +91 981 011 2993 (in India) and +1 908 205 4766 (in USA)

visit Rakesh Pathak on youtube
visit Rakesh Pathak Law Firm on instagram
visit Rakesh Pathak on facebook
visit Rakesh Pathak Law Firm on facebook
Go to the Top